Site icon Quirky Science

Why Cyclodecapentaene is Not an Aromatic Hydrocarbon

cyclodecapentaene
Fig 1. Cyclodecapentaene – all cis form.

There are aromatic hydrocarbons and there are non-aromatic hydrocarbons. For basic mono-ring structures that have alternating carbon-carbon double bonds, there is a rule called Hückel’s rule that defines whether a given hydrocarbon can be aromatic or not. It might seem, at first that cyclodecapentaene (C10H10 or [10]-annulene) should be aromatic. Yet, cyclodecapentaene is not an aromatic hydrocarbon. Let’s find out why not.

A Few Simple Rules for Aromatic Behavior

Why Cyclodecapentaene is not an Aromatic Hydrocarbon

Fig 2. Cyclodecapentaene (trans, cis, trans, cis, cis form) top view

There are four basic structural shapes for cyclodecapentaene. Two of these, however, are obviously not flat. So we dismiss those two forms right off. However, the other two structures fulfill a number of the four requirements.

The rings of both the all cis- isomer (Figure 1) and the trans-cis-trans-cis-cis isomer (Figures 2 & 3) of cyclodecapentaene possess completely conjugated double bonds. Check!

Fig 3. Cyclodecapentaene (trans, cis, trans, cis, cis form) side view

Are these two forms flat? At first glance, they would seem to be. Check!

Both possess 5 double bonds or 10 π-electrons. This fulfills Hückel’s rule for n = 2. Check!

So far, based on requirements 1, 2, and 3, it looks like our hydrocarbon should be aromatic in both its isomer forms.

No. 4 Straw Breaks the Camel’s Back

Uh-oh. Both cis- and trans- isomers break rule qualification number 4.

The cis-isomer has exaggerated carbon-carbon bond angles of approximately 144°. The ideal angle for those bonds is 120°.

The trans-isomer has two hydrogen atoms that come so close together, ring flatness, though seemingly possible with a molecular model kit, is, in fact, prohibited.

Note: You might also enjoy The Aromatic Cyclopentadienyl Anion

References:

← Back to Classic Science
← Home

Exit mobile version